Japan’s Immigration Policies at a Crossroads

Japan’s Immigration Policies at a Crossroads
CJS Logo

Japan is at a historic crossroads with its immigration policies. By the end of 2024, the number of foreign workers and residents in the country had surpassed 3.75 million, accounting for approximately 3 percent of the population. This represents an increase of over 10 percent from the previous year, continuing a steady growth trend since the 1980s. The increase in foreign workers reflects successive policy changes in the late 2010s, with the amendment of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act in 2016. The Act introduced a visa category for mid-skilled foreign care workers. Until then, the country officially admitted only skilled migrants for employment, while in practice, it allowed unskilled foreigners to work on various temporary programs. However, labor shortages in key industries such as construction, manufacturing, and services reached a new high as Japan’s labor force and population aged and decreased.

In response to the steep demand for labor, the Japanese government introduced the Specified Skilled Worker (SSW, Tokutei Ginō) program, comprising a two-phase model, SSW (i) and SSW (ii), in 2019. The policy aims to streamline the admission and employment of foreign workers based on their skill development and, eventually, to grant select workers the right to permanent residency and family reunification. In line with the scheme, the government announced in 2024 that it would abolish the Technical Intern and Training Program (TITP, Ginō Jisshū Seido), which has faced numerous operational problems. It will be replaced with the Employment with Skill Development (ESD, Ikusei Shūrō) program in 2027. The policy change from temporary workers to long-term residents requires national policies that incorporate immigrants into the country’s social and political institutions beyond just labor markets.

The proposed CJS Immigration Symposium will address the processes and effects of these significant changes in state policies since the late 2010s. These changes and their implementations over the past several years prompt the following questions, some of which the symposium speakers will try to answer based on their recent research.

  1. How has the SSW scheme, which is based on foreign workers’ skill development, been received and implemented in such labor-short industries as construction, manufacturing, and care work?
  2. What are the outcomes from the implementation of the SSW in these labor-short industries?
  3. How is the skill development of foreign workers evaluated, and how is it linked to their integration into the Japanese corporate system with potential for long-term residency?
  4. What are the national policies for integrating long-term residents and their families into Japanese social institutions, including education, housing, and social welfare?
  5. Following the July 2025 national election for the House of Councilors, the Sanseitō, a relatively new political party, gained seats by proposing anti-foreign policies. What are the implications of such policies for Japan’s immigration policies when its economy requires more immigrant workers?

Handout

SCHEDULE

Session 1. Introduction and Two Case Studies

3:10-3:13 | Junko Habu - Welcome to the Symposium

3:13-3:25 | Keiko Yamanaka - Introduction to the Symposium and Immigration Policy Changes in Japan

3:25-4:05 | Jotaro Kato - Reconsidering Japan’s Specified Skilled Worker Program: Migratory Agency and the Future of Long-term Settlement

4:05-4:45 | Kikuko Nagayoshi - The Dynamics of the Formation of Transnational Labor Markets and the Role of Intermediaries in Japan

4:45-5:05 | Break

Session 2. One Case Study and Q&A

5:05-5:45 | Reiko Ogawa - Migration, Care and Citizenship in Japan

5:45-6:10 | Keiko Yamanaka, Facilitator, Q&A

ABSTRACTS

Jotaro KATO, Meiji Gakuin University

Reconsidering Japan’s Specified Skilled Worker Program: Migratory Agency and the Future of Long-term Settlement

The Specified Skilled Worker (SSW, Tokutei Ginō) program, introduced in 2019, represents a major policy shift in Japan, as it openly admits foreign nationals as workers in designated sectors. Initially designed as a pragmatic response to labor shortages, it has been carefully distinguished from “immigration policy,” restricting access to family reunification and long-term settlement. Recent reforms, including the 2024 expansion of SSW (ii) and the scheduled replacement of the Technical Intern Training Program by the Employment with Skill Development (ESD, Ikusei Shūrō) program in 2027, highlight the program’s evolving role in Japan’s migration regime. Research across multiple industries (Kato ed. 2025) reveals structural gaps between the official aims of the SSW and the lived realities of migrants. These include persistent dependence on transition from the Technical Intern program, bureaucratic complexity, and limited protection of workers’ rights. At the same time, the experiences of Vietnamese SSW holders point to how migrants navigate these structural constraints through strategies of persistence, adaptation, and long-term planning. Drawing on upcoming interviews with approximately ten Vietnamese SSW holders, this study examines how they exercise migratory agency (de Haas 2021) to shape their trajectories. Some explore opportunities to extend their stay in Japan through SSW (ii) or other visas, while others anticipate a return to Vietnam with new skills, resources, and capabilities. By foregrounding migrants as active agents rather than passive beneficiaries, this approach situates the SSW not merely as a labor market instrument but as a key arena in which Japan’s future as a country of immigration is being challenged and contested.

Kikuko NAGAYOSHI, Tokyo University

The Dynamics of the Formation of Transnational Labor Markets and the Role of Intermediaries in Japan

The number of labor immigrants in Japan has not only increased but also dramatically changed its composition of countries of origin. A growing number of immigrants have come from Southeast Asian and South Asian countries, such as Vietnam, the Philippines, Nepal, Indonesia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Sri Lanka. How has this transnational labor market been created? In this presentation, I explore this issue, focusing on the role of intermediary agencies. The Japanese government has formally incorporated intermediaries into the Technical Intern Training Program, assigning them the role of selecting, training, and managing immigrants as well as supervising employers. These intermediary agencies play similar roles in the SSW program. Based on interviews with intermediary agencies and employers, I found that intermediary agencies actively create networks to recruit immigrant workers from a specific country, considering the potential amount and quality of labor supply, geopolitical risks, perceived cultural similarity with Japan, and public and employer reactions to immigrants from different countries. While they help incorporate immigrant workers into the Japanese labor market by teaching them Japanese business culture and lifestyle (how to clean rooms and dispose of garbage), they are not necessarily interested in helping immigrants settle permanently. They unintentionally support Japan’s selective immigration policies: only immigrants who manage to assimilate into Japanese society are allowed to stay longer in Japan.

Reiko OGAWA, Chiba University

Migration, Care and Citizenship in Japan

The recent policy reforms in Japan served to open diverse migration corridors with access to citizenship, particularly within the field of long-term care work. Although facing the same challenges of population aging, declining total fertility rate, and shrinking labor force, Japan’s care migration corridors became different from—and far more complex than—other East Asian countries in at least two ways. First, there is a pathway to citizenship through the licensure examination, which provides the legal basis for migrants to settle, bring their families, and eventually lead to permanent residency. Secondly, the employment conditions are formal, being protected under labor laws with full social security. These two points diverge from the usual construction of “care work” elsewhere, which is often constructed as “unskilled”, “informal,” and “disposable.”

The presentation elaborates on the idea of “care citizenship,” a citizenship granted by doing care work, and what it entails. The ways in which migrants are incorporated into the care sector manifest a strong inclination towards being a “good citizen,” not just in terms of political membership but also cultural ideas of being liked by the Japanese. Long-term care is embedded in the cultural notion of “Japaneseness,” where ideas and ideals of independence and self-realization have been practiced. Migrant care workers are part and parcel of the realization of the interests of the Japanese elderly, setting their own interests aside. The Japanese language acquisition is an integral part of becoming a care worker that tames the differences and extrinsically constructs a good citizen. The presentation discusses the limits of care citizenship that is not only precarious, as one needs to continue to work as care workers until they obtain permanent residency, but also migrants will be shaped in a particular way to be liked by the Japanese through the training process that starts in the sending countries.

BIOS

Jotaro Kato is an Associate Professor in the Department of Social Work at the Faculty of Sociology and Social Work at Meiji Gakuin University. He specializes in migration studies, international labor mobility, and global sociology. His research focuses on migration infrastructures for irregular migrants and on the migration and development linkages between Japan and Vietnam. He currently serves as Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the Japan Association for Migration Policy Studies. His recent publications include: “Migration Infrastructures and the Production of Migrants’ Irregularity in Japan and the United Kingdom” (with Nando Sigona and Irina Kuznetsova, Comparative Migration Studies, 2021), and “Becoming ‘Illegal’: The Institutional Mechanisms of Migrants’ Illegalization in Japan” (with Gracia Liu-Farrer, Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 2022).

Kikuko Nagayoshi is a Professor of Sociology at the Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo. Her research focuses on three main areas: the socioeconomic integration of immigrants, xenophobia, and other public opinions and attitudes. She examines how formal and informal institutions influence immigrants' socioeconomic status and public opinion about them. Currently, she is studying the role of intermediaries in shaping the international labor market. Nagayoshi recently published an article in the Routledge International Handbook of Interracial and Intercultural Relationships and Mental Health titled “Intercultural Relationships and Marriages in Japan” with Sayaka Osanami Törngren and Hirohisa Takenoshita. She also authored an article in Research in Social Stratification and Mobility titled “Intersections of Gender and Immigrant Status in Japan: Analysis of the 2020 Basic Survey on Wage Structure.”

Reiko Ogawa is a professor at the Graduate School of Social Sciences at Chiba University in Japan. She specializes in sociology, migration and refugee studies, and gender studies, and has researched migrant care workers and refugees. She also serves as a Visiting Researcher at Waseda University and Hokkaido University, and as the PI for the interdisciplinary project, “Participatory Action Research towards Social Integration of Migrants and Refugees.” Her recent publications include: “Transnational Movements: Leveraging International Standards and Decolonizing Feminism,” in Andrea Germar and Ulrike Wohr (eds.), Handbook of Feminisms in Japan (2025); “Migrant Workers in the Care Sector,” G. Meardi (ed.), Research Handbook on Migration and Employment (2024); and “Making Migrant Care Workers in East Asia,” Jieyu Liu and Junko Yamahsita (eds.), Routledge Handbook of East Asian Gender Studies (2020).